✅

The first statement asserts that "All employees of Duluth Paper received a bonus this year." The second statement says, "Andrés did not receive a bonus this year." Given both statements are true, we can infer from them that Andrés cannot be an employee of Duluth Paper this year, because if he were, he would have received a bonus, which contradicts the fact that he did not receive a bonus.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

C) Andrés was not an employee of Duluth Paper this year.<|im_end|>

The author's repetitive use of "She liked it" serves to emphasize the persistence of an outward expression of love (Option C). The phrase is used to highlight the various aspects of Jim that Liz Coates finds appealing, not just in a friendly or professional manner, but with a deeper, more persistent affection. The repetition does not merely indicate that Liz has a friendly disposition towards Jim or that she is observant of him (options B and D). Nor does it solely convey the extent of their friendship (option A); rather, it delves into the specifics of what she likes about him, suggesting a more profound, affectionate interest. The repetitive phrase "She liked it" accumulates these details, painting a picture of Liz's burgeoning affection for Jim, which goes beyond mere friendship or noticing someone's qualities. Therefore, option C best captures the function of this narrative device in the text.<|im_end|>

✅

C<|im_end|>

✅

(B) revisit a commonly-held assumption<|im_end|>

✅

offered to lend Sofie one of her many swimsuits, ensuring they both had a great time at the pool.<|im_end|>

✅

"Let's use my hat as a replacement pawn."<|im_end|>

Jane realized they had forgotten their charger; it was dead.<|im_end|>

Mia suggested they check the storage building for a spare volleyball.<|im_end|>

✅

C) By preserving it with salt<|im_end|>

✅

C) shifting responsibility for the costs of recycling<|im_end|>

✅

A) It is very old<|im_end|>

✅

B) Short and dark with a big mustache and big hands<|im_end|>

Let's analyze the problem step by step.

1. We know that the garden is rectangular and that its length (L) is four times its width (W). So we can write this relationship as L = 4W.

2. The perimeter (P) of a rectangle is given by the formula P = 2L + 2W. We are given that the perimeter is 60 feet, so we can write this as 60 = 2L + 2W.

3. Now we can substitute the relationship from step 1 (L = 4W) into the perimeter formula: 60 = 2(4W) + 2W.

4. Simplify the equation: 60 = 8W + 2W.

5. Combine like terms: 60 = 10W.

6. Solve for W: W = 60 / 10.

7. Calculate the result: W = 6.

Thus, the width of the garden is 6 feet.<|im_end|>

✅

D) the arrangement of her hair<|im_end|>

✅

B) Juxtapose two peoples' sentiments<|im_end|>

Let's analyze each option:

(A) If Jane cannot bake, then she is not Lisa's sister.
This statement suggests that only Lisa's sisters can bake. However, the initial statement only tells us that all of Lisa's sisters can bake, not that only Lisa's sisters can bake. Therefore, this statement does not necessarily follow from the initial statement.

(B) If Sarah can bake, then she is not Lisa's sister.
This statement is not guaranteed by the initial statement. Just because Sarah can bake does not mean she cannot be Lisa's sister, as the initial statement only establishes that all of Lisa's sisters can bake.

(C) If Mary can bake, then she is Lisa's sister.
This statement is also not guaranteed by the initial statement. The initial statement only tells us that all of Lisa's sisters can bake; it does not say that only Lisa's sisters can bake. Therefore, Mary being able to bake does not necessarily mean she is Lisa's sister.

(D) If Emma is not Lisa's sister, then she cannot bake.
This statement is the contrapositive of the initial statement. The initial statement tells us that all of Lisa's sisters can bake, which is logically equivalent to saying if someone is not Lisa's sister, then they cannot bake. However, the initial statement only establishes that all of Lisa's sisters can bake, not that everyone else cannot. So, while this statement aligns with the logical structure of the initial statement, it goes beyond what we can conclude from the given information.

(E) None of these.

Given the information in the initial statement, none of the options necessarily follow. The initial statement only provides information about Lisa's sisters and their ability to bake, but it does not exclude the possibility of other individuals who can bake or are not Lisa's sisters. Therefore, the most accurate conclusion based on the options provided is:

E) None of these.<|im_end|>

Let's analyze each statement:

1. "All members of the chess team are also members of the robotics club."
This means that being a member of the chess team is a sufficient condition for being a member of the robotics club. 

2. "No members of the basketball team are members of the chess team."
This means that being a member of the basketball team is a sufficient condition for not being a member of the chess team.

Now, let's examine each option:

(A) If Izak is in the robotics club, then he is not on the basketball team.
This statement is not necessarily true. Just because Izak is in the robotics club, it doesn't automatically exclude him from being on the basketball team, as there is no direct relationship stated between the basketball team and the robotics club.

(B) If Jerry is in the robotics club, then he is on the chess team.
This statement is true. According to the first statement, if someone is in the robotics club, they must also be on the chess team because all members of the chess team are also members of the robotics club.

(C) If Lisa is on the basketball team, then she is not in the robotics club.
This statement is true. According to the second statement, if someone is on the basketball team, they cannot be a member of the chess team. Since all chess team members are in the robotics club, Lisa being on the basketball team means she cannot be in the robotics club.

(D) If Sanjit is on the chess team, then he is on the basketball team.
This statement is not necessarily true. Sanjit being on the chess team only tells us that he is also in the robotics club, but it doesn't necessarily mean he is on the basketball team.

(E) If Seong-Jin is not in the robotics club, then he is not on the chess team.
This statement is true. According to the first statement, all members of the chess team are also members of the robotics club. Therefore, if someone is not in the robotics club, they cannot be on the chess team.

The correct answers are:
- (B) If Jerry is in the robotics club, then he is on the chess team.
- (C) If Lisa is on the basketball team, then she is not in the robotics club.
- (E) If Seong-Jin is not in the robotics club, then he is not on the chess team.

B, C, E<|im_end|>

Let's analyze the given information step-by-step:

1. The person in Britain has the broken sword.
2. The son, who is not in Denmark, neither has the gold doubloon nor the silver watch.
3. The family member in Egypt has the family tree.
4. The mother has the silver watch but isn't in Mexico.
5. The grandmother has the gold doubloon and is either in Denmark or Canada.

First, we know that the grandmother has the gold doubloon and is in either Denmark or Canada. Since we are given that the grandmother is in Denmark, this leaves Canada for the other locations.

Next, we know the mother has the silver watch and isn't in Mexico. This means the mother can only be in Britain, Canada, or Egypt.

Now, let's consider the son. He is not in Denmark (from statement 2), so he can be in Britain, Canada, Egypt, or Mexico. However, he doesn't have the gold doubloon or the silver watch. This leaves the broken sword and the oceanic map as possible items for the son. Since the broken sword is in Britain, the son cannot be there. This means the son can only be in Canada, Egypt, or Mexico.

Since the son cannot be in Denmark, and the mother cannot be in Mexico, the only option left for the mother is Britain.

So, the mother is in Britain.

Mother: Britain<|im_end|>

◆★▲<|im_end|>

✅

★, ◆, ●, ▲<|im_end|>

✅

▲★●◆<|im_end|>

✅

★ ● ▲ ◆<|im_end|>

Let's analyze the given information and set up an equation to solve for n.

We know that each student writes n verses plus twice as many verses as their class rank. The 7th student, therefore, writes n verses plus twice 7 verses.

The equation representing the total number of verses written by the 7th student is:
\[ n + 2 \times 7 = 20 \]

Now, let's solve for n step by step:

1. Simplify the equation:
\[ n + 14 = 20 \]

2. Subtract 14 from both sides to isolate n:
\[ n = 20 - 14 \]

3. Calculate n:
\[ n = 6 \]

Therefore, the value of n is 6.

---

**The answer is n = 6.<|im_end|>

To find the value of 4 ◘ 3 using the defined operation x ◘ y = 2x - 3y + 1, we will substitute x with 4 and y with 3 and then calculate the result step by step.

Step 1: Substitute x with 4 and y with 3 in the expression 2x - 3y + 1.
2(4) - 3(3) + 1

Step 2: Perform the multiplication.
8 - 9 + 1

Step 3: Perform the addition and subtraction.
8 - 9 + 1 = -1 + 1 = 0

Therefore, the value of 4 ◘ 3 is 0.<|im_end|>

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for time, which is:

\[ \text{Time} = \frac{\text{Distance}}{\text{Speed}} \]

We are given the distance (60 miles) and the speed (30 mph). Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

\[ \text{Time} = \frac{60 \text{ miles}}{30 \text{ mph}} \]

Now, we calculate the time:

\[ \text{Time} = 2 \text{ hours} \]

Therefore, it will take John 2 hours to reach the park.

**Answer:**
It will take John 2 hours to reach the park.<|im_end|>

To solve this problem, we need to consider the possible integers greater than 99 and less than 200 with exactly one duplicate digit. Since the hundreds' place duplicates the ones' place, we can analyze the possible cases based on the digit in the ones' place.

1. If the ones' place is 0, the hundreds' place will also be 0, but this is not possible since we are looking for integers greater than 99. Therefore, no numbers start with 0.

2. If the ones' place is 1, the hundreds' place will also be 1. This gives us the number 11_, and we need to find a digit for the tens' place that will make the number greater than 99 and less than 200. The tens' place can be any digit from 0 to 9, but since 1 is already used, we have 9 possibilities: 110, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119.

3. If the ones' place is 2, the hundreds' place will also be 2. This gives us the number 22_, and we need to find a digit for the tens' place that will make the number greater than 99 and less than 200. The tens' place can be any digit from 0 to 9, but since 2 is already used, we have 8 possibilities: 220, 221, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228. Note that 222 does not count because it has two duplicate digits.

4. This pattern continues, and we can count the possibilities for each starting digit up to 9, as the number 200 is not included.

So, the total number of integers with exactly one duplicate digit is the sum of the possibilities for each starting digit from 1 to 9. Since the pattern is consistent, we can calculate the total by taking the sum of the first 9 positive integers (excluding 0) and then multiplying by 9 to account for each starting digit.

The sum of the first 9 positive integers (excluding 0) is:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 = 45

Since each starting digit from 1 to 9 will have this same number of possibilities, we multiply by 9:
45 * 9 = 405

Therefore, there are 405 integers greater than 99 and less than 200 that have exactly one duplicate digit.

The correct answer is: There are 405 such integers.<|im_end|>

Given the information:

1. Britain - broken sword
2. Son - not gold doubloon, not silver watch, not Denmark
3. Egypt - family tree
4. Mother - silver watch, not Mexico
5. Grandmother - gold doubloon, Denmark or Canada

And daughter has the oceanic map.

From (2), since the son doesn't have the gold doubloon or the silver watch, and from (4) and (5), the mother and grandmother can't be in Mexico, Denmark, or Canada (because the grandmother can only be in Denmark or Canada), the son must be in Mexico with the oceanic map.

From (1), the person in Britain can't have the broken sword. From (3), the person in Egypt has the family tree. From (5), the grandmother can't be in Denmark or Canada as she has the gold doubloon, so she must be in Mexico. But (4) states the mother has the silver watch and can't be in Mexico, which contradicts the established information.

To resolve this contradiction, let's reassess the initial placement. Since the grandmother can only be in Denmark or Canada, and holding the gold doubloon, she can't be in Mexico, the mother with the silver watch must be in Britain (as it can't be Egypt, Denmark, or Canada due to the other items and the grandmother's condition).

Now, with the son in Mexico with the oceanic map, the grandmother in Canada with the gold doubloon, the mother in Britain with the silver watch, and the grandmother can't be in Denmark (due to the initial contradiction), the only place left for the daughter with the family tree is Denmark.

Therefore, the daughter is in Denmark.

Daughter - Denmark<|im_end|>