StableLM Zephyr 3B

Score051015202527Size (bn params, log scale)0.5110101001000StableLM Zephyr 3B

Score:

9

33.3%

Strict score:

4

14.8%

Family:

StableLM

Size:

3B parameters

License:

Stability AI

Quant type:

Q6 K

Question

Correct

Strict Correct

Response

RCS5

(B) revisit a commonly-held assumption<|endoftext|>

SC2

Ben quickly retrieved a pawn from his hat, placing it on the board with enthusiasm. Lily's face brightened. "That's a great idea! Now we can play."<|endoftext|>

RCS4

(A) polished<|endoftext|>

RCS1

C) By preserving it with salt<|endoftext|>

RCS2

C) shifting responsibility for the costs of recycling<|endoftext|>

RCS3

C<|endoftext|>

RCL1

B) Short and dark with a big mustache and big hands<|endoftext|>

LO2

◆ ★ ◆ ◙ ◆ ◙ ▲ ◆<|endoftext|>

LO3

★▲●◆<|endoftext|>

RCL3

The author includes the detail of Jim noticing the whiteness of Liz Coates' teeth (C) as a way to show that he has noticed her.<|endoftext|>

RCL4

The author's repetitive use of "She liked it" serves to emphasize the degree to which a friendship has blossomed (A).<|endoftext|>

RCL5

D) Demonstrate two peoples' feelings toward their occupations

Reasoning: The paragraphs mentioned in the passage describe the appearance and relationship between Jim Gilmore and Liz Coates, as well as their respective relationships with A. J. Smith and Mrs. Smith. These details focus more on their feelings toward their occupations, as Jim is a blacksmith and Liz works for Smith's (which could imply she works in some capacity related to Smith's business or home). The passage implies that Liz has a strong, personal liking for Jim, which demonstrates their feelings toward their occupations.<|endoftext|>

LG2

B) If Jerry is in the robotics club, then he is on the chess team

Reasoning: From statement 1, we know that all members of the chess team are also members of the robotics club. Since Jerry is in the robotics club, he must be a member of the chess team as well. 

Now let's analyze the other statements:

A) If Izak is in the robotics club, then he is not on the basketball team:
Izak could potentially be on the basketball team (it doesn't contradict statement 1), so we cannot conclude that he is not on the basketball team based on the given information.

C) If Lisa is on the basketball team, then she is not in the robotics club:
Lisa cannot be both on the basketball team and in the robotics club, as stated in statement 1.

D) If Sanjit is on the chess team, then he is on the basketball team:
This statement contradicts statement 1, as Sanjit cannot be both on the chess team and the basketball team.

E) If Seong-Jin is not in the robotics club, then he is not on the chess team:
Seong-Jin not being in the robotics club does not necessarily mean he cannot be on the chess team, as there is no information about his involvement with the basketball team.<|endoftext|>

LG5

If the Grandmother is in Denmark, the Mother must be in either Mexico, Britain, or Canada, since she is not in Denmark. This is because the statement "The grandmother has the gold doubloon and is either in Denmark or Canada" implies that the Grandmother could be in either of those two countries. Therefore, we can exclude Denmark as the location for the Mother. 

Now, let's analyze the remaining information:

1. The person in Britain has the broken sword.
2. The son, who is not in Denmark, neither has the gold doubloon nor the silver watch.
3. The family member in Egypt has the family tree.
4. The mother has the silver watch but isn't in Mexico.

From statement 2, we can deduce that the son is not in Denmark, Mexico, or Britain (as he doesn't have the gold doubloon or silver watch), and he is not in Egypt since the family member with the family tree is in Egypt. 

Let's analyze statement 4: the mother has the silver watch but isn't in Mexico. This means that the mother must be in one of the other four countries (Britain, Denmark, Canada, or Egypt), as she is not in Mexico.

Based on the given information and the logical deduction, we can create a family tree diagram as follows:

Grandmother (in either Denmark or Canada)
• Mother (not in Mexico)
• Father
• Son (not in Denmark, Mexico, or Egypt)
• Daughter (not in Denmark, Mexico, or Egypt)

Now, let's go back to statement 1, which states that the person in Britain has the broken sword. According to this information, the person in Britain is the Father.

So, if the Grandmother is in Denmark, the Mother is in either Mexico, Britain, or Canada. The Father is in Britain, and the Son and Daughter are not in Denmark, Mexico, or Egypt. This family tree diagram represents the correct answer to the question:

Grandmother (in either Denmark or Canada)
• Mother (not in Mexico)
• Father (in Britain)
• Son (not in Denmark, Mexico, or Egypt)
• Daughter (not in Denmark, Mexico, or Egypt)<|endoftext|>

LO1

★▲◆<|endoftext|>

LO4

★ ◆ ★ ◆ ◙

1. User inputs 'Current Password' and 'New Password'.
2. Retrieve the password and check that it matches the 'Current Password' input by the user.
3. If the check is unsuccessful, print "Unauthorized – try again" and do not complete any more steps.
4. If the check is successful, store the "New Password" as the password and notify the user "Password successfully set"; do not complete any more steps.
5. ★ (This step is not necessary as the password has been updated successfully.)<|endoftext|>

MW1

Let's denote the number of verses the student writes as "n" and the number of extra verses due to their class rank as "2 * (rank - 1)" for the 7th student. Since the 7th student wrote 20 verses, we have the equation:

20 = n + 2 * (7 - 1)

Now, let's solve the equation step-by-step:

1. Simplify the equation by distributing the 2:
   20 = n + 2 * 6

2. Combine the terms:
   20 = n + 12

3. Subtract 12 from both sides:
   8 = n

So, the value of n is 8. The 7th student wrote 8 verses.

The correct answer is n = 8.<|endoftext|>

MW2

To find the value of 4 ◘ 3, we substitute 4 for x and 3 for y in the expression 2x - 3y + 1.

4 ◘ 3 = 2(4) - 3(3) + 1
        = 8 - 9 + 1
        = -1 + 1
        = 0

Therefore, the value of 4 ◘ 3 is 0.

The answer is: 0<|endoftext|>

MW3

To find the time it takes for John to reach the park, we can use the formula: time = distance / speed.

First, we need to convert the distance from miles to hours since speed is given in miles per hour (mph). There are 5280 feet in a mile and 60 minutes in an hour, so we can calculate the distance in feet by multiplying the distance in miles by the appropriate conversion factor:

Distance in feet = 60 miles * 5280 feet/mile * 60 minutes/hour = 36,259,200 feet.

Now we can use the formula to find the time:

Time = Distance in feet / Speed
Time = 36,259,200 feet / 30 mph

Calculating the time...
Time ≈ 1,210.64 hours (rounded to two decimal places)

So, it will take John approximately 1,210.64 hours to reach the park.<|endoftext|>

MW5

To find the number of integers between 100 and 199 that have exactly one duplicate digit, we can first identify the possible duplicate digits. Since the digit in the hundreds place duplicates the digit in the ones' place, the possible duplicate digits are 1 and 9.

Now we can create a list of integers that meet this criteria:

1. 109
2. 119
3. 129
4. 139
5. 149
6. 159
7. 169
8. 179
9. 189

We can see that there are 8 integers in this list. Therefore, the correct answer is:

There are 8 integers between 100 and 199 that have exactly one duplicate digit.<|endoftext|>

SC1

Elena promptly offered to lend Sofie one of her swimsuits, and they happily went swimming together that afternoon.<|endoftext|>

SC4

As Jane checked the charging status, Paul explained they had planned for this situation and ensured their phones were fully charged for the day ahead.<|endoftext|>

SC5

At the top, they discovered a dusty storage room with shelves of mismatched volleyballs. Ecstatic, they retrieved a ball and resumed the game, celebrating their final summer camp experience.<|endoftext|>

LG3

To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the given statements step by step:

1. "All employees of Duluth Paper received a bonus this year": This statement implies that every employee of Duluth Paper got a bonus.
2. "Andrés did not receive a bonus this year": This statement tells us that Andrés, a specific individual, did not receive a bonus.

Now, let's evaluate the options:

A) "Not all employees of Duluth Paper received a bonus this year": This option contradicts the first statement.
B) "No one who received a bonus is an employee of Duluth Paper": This option contradicts the first statement as well.
C) "Andrés was not an employee of Duluth Paper this year": This option doesn't relate to the statements about receiving bonuses.
D) "Andrés received a bonus this year": This option contradicts the second statement, as Andrés did not receive a bonus.
E) "None of these": This option seems to be the most reasonable choice, as it negates the logical consistency of the first statement, given the information from the second statement.

Therefore, if both statements are true, the correct answer must be E) None of these.<|endoftext|>

MW4

To find the width of the garden, we can use the given information and apply basic geometry.

Step 1: Let x be the width of the garden. Since the length is four times the width, the length would be 4x.

Step 2: The perimeter of a rectangle is given by the formula P = 2(length + width). In this case, we have 60 feet as the perimeter, so we can write the equation as 60 = 2(4x + x).

Step 3: Simplify the equation by distributing the 2: 60 = 2(5x).

Step 4: Divide both sides by 2: 30 = 5x.

Step 5: Solve for x by dividing both sides by 5: x = 6.

So, the width of the garden is 6 feet.<|endoftext|>

LG1

Let's analyze the given statements step-by-step:

1. "All of Lisa's sisters can bake."
   This statement tells us that at least one of Lisa's sisters is a baker.

Now, let's look at the options:

(A) If Jane cannot bake, then she is not Lisa's sister.
   Since we know that at least one of Lisa's sisters can bake (from statement 1), we can eliminate this option.

(B) If Sarah can bake, then she is not Lisa's sister.
   This statement contradicts statement 1, as it claims that Sarah is not Lisa's sister. However, we can't completely rule this option out yet, as there is still the possibility that Lisa has no sisters or only one sister who can bake.

(C) If Mary can bake, then she is Lisa's sister.
   This statement aligns with statement 1, as it implies that Mary is indeed one of Lisa's sisters and can bake.

(D) If Emma is not Lisa's sister, then she cannot bake.
   This statement contradicts statement 1, as it claims that Emma is not Lisa's sister. However, we can't completely rule this option out yet, as there is still the possibility that Lisa has no sisters or only one sister who can bake.

(E) None of these

Since we have eliminated options A and B (which contradict statement 1) and options C and D (which either align or contradict statement 1), we are left with option E, which states "None of these."

So, the correct answer is E) None of these.<|endoftext|>

LG4

To determine the daughter's location, let's go through the given information and make connections step by step:

1. The person in Britain has the broken sword.
This means that either the Father or Mother (or someone else not mentioned yet) is in Britain.

2. The son, who is not in Denmark, neither has the gold doubloon nor the silver watch.
Since we know the son doesn't have the gold doubloon (given in statement 3), and we also know that the mother has the silver watch but isn't in Mexico (given in statement 5), we can eliminate the possibility of the mother being responsible for the gold doubloon. So, we are left with either the Father or the Daughter not having the gold doubloon, and the other family member (Son or Father) having the silver watch.

3. The family member in Egypt has the family tree.
This means that the family member in Egypt must be either the Grandmother, Father, or Daughter. Since the grandmother has the gold doubloon and is either in Denmark or Canada (given in statement 4), we can eliminate the possibility of the family member in Egypt being the grandmother. So, we are left with either the Father, Daughter, or both having the family tree.

Now, let's focus on the daughter's location:

If the daughter has the oceanic map, we know she cannot be in Denmark, as the grandmother is in Denmark (given in statement 4). This leaves us with two possibilities: the daughter is either in Canada or Egypt. However, we are given that the daughter is in possession of the oceanic map, so her location must be Egypt.

Answer: The daughter is located in Egypt.<|endoftext|>